Sunday, September 29, 2024

Naturalization Documents and Name Changes or, When Was Your Ancestor's Name Changed and By Whom?

There are some who believe that their ancestors' names were change at Ellis Island.  There are others who discount this claim.  My ancestors immigrated before Ellis Island became one of the major immigration centers, so I don't have experiences either way.

My interest in this topic came about from reading others' claims and, most recently, from transcribing documents at FamilySearch for immigrants who lived in New York City and Chicago, Illinois.  I thought what I found in the documents might shed light on this discussion.  The documents I've transcribed are usually declarations of intention and petitions for naturalization. 

From year to year and location to location, the wording of naturalization documents changed, as did the information requested.  The papers in 1940 papers may not request the same information in 1915 or 1928 or 1935, etc.
 
The samples below are undated because the same forms were used for a number of years.  I present them as examples of the variety of wording.  You'll notice that the Declaration of Intention asks for the petitioner's name upon his arrival.  The Petition for Naturalization asks for the petitioner's name upon arrival and also offers him the opportunity to request that his name be changed and to what.

Declaration of Intention (Northern District, Illinois)

I emigrated to the United States of America from _______________
my lawful entry for permanent residence was at _______________
under the name of _______________.

Petition for Naturalization (Northern District, Illinois)
My lawful entry for permanent residence in the United States was at  _______________,
under the name of _______________ . . . .
I, your petitioner for naturalization, pray that I may be admitted a citizen of the United States of America, and that my name be changed to _______________,

Petition for Naturalization (Eastern District of Brooklyn, New York)
My lawful entry for permanent residence in the United States of America from _____________________ was at _____________________,
under the name of ______________________ . . . .
Wherefore, I, your petitioner, pray that I may be admitted a citizen of the United States of America, and that my name be changed to ________________.

While indexing I often see requests for name changes.  Here are a few I've seen.

Women's Given Names
  • Malka to Mollie
  • Chaie to Anna
  • Hannah to Anna
  • Hannah to Hanna
  • Elke to Elsie
  • Therese to Thea
  • Fruma to Fannie
  • Gittel to Grace
  • Maria to Josephine
  • Maria to Mary
  • Shandle to Jennie
  • Sura to Sarah
  • Gudrun to Gertrude
  • Bertina to Bertha
  • Kataline to Catherine
  • Chaje-Sura to Ida
  • Rozalia to Rose
  • Faura to Tania
  • Golde to Pauline
  • Bridget to Beatrice
Men's Given Names
  • Lykia to Luka
  • Rafalio to Ralph Albert
  • Markus to Max
  • Alfred to Fred
  • Isidore to Isedor
  • Vazul to William
  • Luigi to Louis
  • Schaie to Sam
  • Hersh to Harry
  • Jurko to George
  • Ivanovich to John
  • Moisejos to Morris
  • Ziegmont to Sigmund
  • Mosk/Mosxk to Max
  • Szaja to Sam (Polish)
  • Wojciech to Albert
  • Boldizsar to Baltazar
  • Gregor to George
  • Berek to Bennie
  • Eutranik to Jack
Surnames
  • Buterkuchen to Butter
  • Gedacht to Goldfarb
  • Hirschhorn to Harris
  • Marku to Marcus
  • Zelenaia to Zellner
  • Szuster to Shuster
  • Frieder to Friedes
  • Raczkowski to Cohen to Rogers
  • Pisani to Pinto
  • Haraj to Haray
  • Ozderas to Osder
  • Paidock to Pudok
  • Feilgut to Filgut
  • Matusenko to Matusen
  • Karlsson to Carlson
  • Ismul to Charles
  • Marcopoulos to Marks
  • Vavrova to Vavrys
  • Orlinsky to Forer
  • Tchiluigurian to Chulengarian
  • Rosenberger to Ross

Some changes seem to be English variants of names from other languages, such as Rozalia to Rose and Rafalio to Ralph.  Others seem to have no connection to former names:  Orlinsky to Forer and Gedacht to Goldfarb.  I'm not fluent in other languages so perhaps there is a connection between the original names and the new names.

Based on the documents I've indexed, it seems more likely to me that individuals requested name changes themselves rather than employees at Ellis Island or elsewhere making the changes without the consent of the immigrants.

You can read more at these two links

Do you have experience with name changes among your ancestors?  Can you tell when the name change happened and who initiated it?

—Nancy.

Copyright © 2024 Nancy Messier.  All Rights Reserved. 
Do not copy or use any content from this blog without written permission from the owner. 

.

Sunday, August 25, 2024

Ancestors Who Suffered the Loss of a Parent at a Young Age - SNGF

Randy's Saturday Night Genealogy Fun this week asked
1)  Do you have ancestors who suffered the loss of one or both parents early in their life?  Did the surviving parent remarry soon after one parent died?  Was a guardian appointed for your ancestor to protect their physical or legal interests?    

2)  Tell us about one or two of your "orphaned" ancestors and how this affected their life.
In five generations I have five ancestors who were young, from 8 years to 1 month, when either a father or mother died.  I don't know whether I feel sorrier for the children left without a parent, or parents left with young children and no spouse.  Either circumstance would be heart-breaking.

These are my five ancestors who became half-orphans.
  1. Lee Doyle, my father, and his twin sister, Leila, were born in February, 1913.  Leila died soon after birth.  Lee was about a month old when his mother, Beulah Mae (Gerner) Doyle, died in early April.  She was 24.  She left behind her husband, Gust, and little Lee, about a month old.

    I believe my father's life was difficult without his mother.  His father remarried a woman who was, perhaps jealous of my father or of his mother.  From what I've heard, she was somewhat abusive and Gust did his best to keep Lee away from her.  My father once said he knew about the stepmother in Cinderella.

    He spent time with his grandparents, William and Tressa (Froman) Doyle.  But a grandmother, no matter how loving, cannot replace a mother.

    Additionally, my father's father, Gust, died when my father was 21 and Gust was 44.

  2. Elizabeth (Armitage) Meinzen, my great-grandmother, was born in 1852.  She was 4 years old when her mother, Eliza (Hartley) Armitage, died of consumption in 1856 at the age of 44.  Eliza left behind her husband, Abel, and two daughters, ages 6 and 4.

  3. Edward Jesse Bickerstaff, my great-grandfather, was born in 1871.  He was 7 when his mother, Emma (Nelson) Bickerstaff, died in 1878.  Emma was 33 years old at the time of her death.  She left her husband, Ellis, and three children, ages 15 to 7.

  4. Tressa Rose (Froman) Doyle, my great-grandmother, was born in 1867.  She was 4 years old when her father, John Froman, died in 1871.  He was about 30 years old at the time of his death.  John left behind his pregnant wife, Catherine (Saylor) Froman, and six children, ages 10 to 1. A baby born 2 months after his death.
    In this case, John left the family in debt and the children were provided a guardian, S. W. Mannheimer, whose identity or relationship I've been unable to determine.  Catherine's father, Jacob D. Seylor/Sailer/Seyler, was the administrator.

  5. Andrew Doyle, my great-great-grandfather, was born in 1836.  He was 2 years old when his father, William Doyle, died in an accident in 1838 when he was about 36.  William left behind his pregnant wife, Martha, and five children ages 12 to 2.  The baby was born six months later.

It is surprising to me that two of these fathers, John Froman and William Doyle, were both coal miners.  William died after being run over by a cart wheel.  Were both accidental mining deaths?  Also surprising is that both of their wives were pregnant at the time of their deaths.

Thanks for the genealogy fun, Randy.

—Nancy.

Copyright © 2024 Nancy Messier.  All Rights Reserved. 
Do not copy or use any content from this blog without written permission from the owner. 

.

Saturday, July 27, 2024

Results of Grandparents' Surname Searches at FamilySearch Full Text Search for Saturday Night Genealogy Fun

For Saturday Night Genealogy Fun this week, Randy Seaver of Genea-Musings suggested this:
How many "Wills" for your grandparents' or great-grandparents' surnames are on the FamilySearch Full Text Search feature (see https://www.familysearch.org/search/full-text)?
I finished my list then realized that lists may contain results for much more than wills.  FamilySearch has expanded this collection so the results may include the following:  Legal Records, Censuses, Religious Records, Genealogies, Funeral Home Records, Miscellaneous Records, Military Records, Periodicals, School Records, Vital Records, Business Records, Government Records, Reference Materials, Voting Records, Migration Records, and Medical Records. 

I didn't go back to narrow the results to only wills so my results include all of the records FamilySearch found for each surname.

These are the results for my grandparents' and great-grandparents' surnames.
  • Doyle:  350,391 results
  • Gerner:  4,314 results
  • Meinzen:  63 results
  • Bickerstaff:  4356 results
  • Froman:  13,413
  • Bartley:  79,132
  • Armitage:  30,570
  • Thompson:  3,374,976

And these are the results for my second and third great-grandparents' surnames.
  • Laws:  3,374,976
  • Saylor:  8,497,986
  • Stahl:  47,367
  • Smith:  11,710,373
  • Hartley:  158,093
  • Nelson:  2,200,328
  • Bell:  2,835,995

I admit I was surprised at the high number of results for some of these surnames.  Talk about common names!  Thank goodness I can narrow the results by adding a first name; by country, state, and county; or by kind of record.

Thanks for the fun, Randy.
—Nancy.

Copyright © 2024 Nancy Messier.  All Rights Reserved. 
Do not copy or use any content from this blog without written permission from the owner. 

.

Thursday, June 6, 2024

Ideas for Dealing with an Impasse in Research

After participating in Randy Seaver's most recent Saturday Night Genealogy Fun in which we were invited to write about our most frustrating research challenge, I decided to edit, update, and publish this post based on one I wrote a number of years ago.  (Reminders are good, right?) 

When I come upon an impasse in a family history search I often fall back and consider possibilities.  I prefer to call it an impasse — just a little hitch in progress until I figure out the next steps, the next places to search for a solution.  These are my suggestions for next steps when dealing with an impasse.  

First, I consider all the records I have — civil (census, birth, marriage, death, court records, etc.), parish, undocumented family records, and any others — and ask myself these questions.
  • Have I carefully reviewed every document for every scrap of information and recorded it?
  • Have I missed anything in those documents and, if so, what?  How will it help me?
  • Did I misunderstand or misread some record or some information given to me?
  • Was the record from a different time period with words I don't understand?  If so, I find the definitions so I do understand, and if I still don't, I ask for help.
  • Was any of the information I received transcribed from another document/record and, if so, how many times had it been transcribed from the original (knowing that every transcription allows for further misinformation to be passed along)?  Can I find the original?
  • Which information that I've received might be inaccurate?  Undocumented family records and word-of-mouth information are high on this list in one line of my family.
 
Next I consider the possibilities.
  • If there was a fee to register the birth/marriage/death to create a civil document, might the event have been registered later than it actually happened?  Might it have been given an inaccurate date so it falls within the registration deadline?  I can imagine this could happen if the registrants didn't have money to pay the fee at the time of the event.
  • If an ancestor had to go to a courthouse to record an event, how far did they live from the courthouse?  Would it have been a challenge for them to get there to record the event?
  • If a child was born out of wedlock, might that have prevented the baby from being baptized/christened?  If so, there may not be a parish record for the event.
  • If a child was born out of wedlock, was his surname listed as the mother's maiden name, or the father's surname?  I should check both surnames, especially if the first search doesn't reveal a record.
  • If the child was born out of wedlock, did the child's birth require civil registration? 
  • If the parents moved (or the county boundaries moved) between the time of their marriage and the birth of any of their children, which locations would need to be checked? 
  • If the problem is a marriage and I'm unable to find a marriage record, might there at least be marriage banns amongst the parish records or a note in a gossipy local newspaper? 
  • If it's a death record I'm unable to find, have I searched records in all possible death locations?
  • What other records, both formal and informal, might help me discover information for an event in an ancestor's life?

Most important:  I need to make notes as I review the documents and records I have.  I can't rely on my memory.  I note
  • the probable date of an event
  • the records I have and important information in them
  • any connections I see between records such as locations, possible relationships, events near the same dates, etc.
  • the next records to search
  • the next place to search
  • that wisp of an idea that fluttered through my mind, no matter how improbable, unlikely, or impossible it seemed
A list like this and notes like these almost become a to-do list and will be similar to a research log in advance of the research.

I'm sure you, dear readers, have plenty of other suggestions for next steps when dealing with an impasse and I hope you'll share them!

—Nancy.

Copyright © 2024 Nancy Messier.  All Rights Reserved. 
Do not copy or use any content from this blog without written permission from the owner. 

.

Sunday, June 2, 2024

My Most Frustrating Research Challenge, for Saturday Night Genealogy Fun (on Sunday)

Randy's suggestion for genealogy fun this past Saturday was to write about our most frustrating research challenge.  I chuckled when I saw "fun" and "most frustrating research challenge" in the same sentence.  Who but a genealogist/family historian would consider frustrating research to be fun?  (It is, isn't it?!)  There are probably some people with other hobbies and professions who might but I don't know who.

I can't decide which ancestor presents the most challenging research.  It could be Henry C. Meinzen, whose place of origin and parents' names I've yet to verifiably discover; or it might be William Doyle, son of Andrew and Elizabeth (Laws) Doyle, whose absence of a birth record leaves his connection to his parents in question; or it may be the other William Doyle, a coal miner who died in 1838, whose parents I've been unable to discover.

Henry Carl (or C.) Meinzen, in brief
Henry is my great-grandfather, my mother's paternal grandfather.  He and his family were easily found in the 1870, 1880, and 1900-1920 U.S. Census records, living in Steubenville, Jefferson County, Ohio.  He was born in either Hannover, Prussia, or Germany (depending on the census year), in 1837.  According to his naturalization documents, he immigrated in 1866 and became a naturalized citizen in 1871.  He married Elizabeth Armitage in 1870.  He died in 1926, in Steubenville.  All information on his death certificate comes from what I consider hearsay because it was passed along from him to his children.  His death certificate gives his father's name as Carl Meinzen. 

Now come the interesting parts.
  • There is a Graves Registration Card for Henry C. Meinzen.  It indicates that he served in the Civil War from August 11, 1862, to August 10, 1863, in the U.S. Navy as a Seaman on the ships "Cairo" and "Brilliant."  All information on the card corresponds correctly to known information about Henry but I have been unable to locate any information about him serving in the Civil War.  If this information were true, it suggests that he arrived in the U.S. four years earlier than he states on his naturalization record.  I have found no evidence anywhere to verify this information or his service in the Union or Confederate military.  
  • There is an immigration record at the Castle Garden website for Ernst Meinzen with information that corresponds exactly to Henry's information -- all except the first name.  The age, arrival date, and destination could all be Henry's information.  I've found no immigration record for Henry or Heinrich Meinzen.  I continue to wonder if Ernst and Henry could be the same man.  I've not found an Ernst Meinzen born in 1837 or thereabouts, in Ohio.  Did Henry change his name or decide to use a name other than the one he used in Hannover/Prussia/Germany?  A new start with a new name?  There were no ID cards in the 1870s....
  • A somewhat distant cousin told me the story of three Meinzen brothers who travelled together from Germany, arriving by train in Ohio.  Henry decided to stop and stay in Steubenville, Ohio.  Truth, or is it the three brothers myth? 
  • Henry's sister, Sophia (Meinzen) Kropp, arrived in the U.S. in 1887, along with her husband and several children, and settled in Steubenville, Ohio.  Neither her death certificate nor obituary mention her mother's name and her death certificate tells me that her father's name is Deidrick Meinzen.  Of course, it's possible that it was Carl Deidrick or Deidrick Carl, or that the informant for the death certificate misunderstood the question, but there's no way to know until I find further information.

William Doyle, in brief
William is my great-grandfather, my father's paternal grandfather.  Family records tell me that he was born in Bedlington, Northumberland, England, in March, 1873, and is the son of Andrew and Elizabeth Jane (Laws) Doyle.  I've found an immigration record, have reviewed U.S. census records, have a death certificate, an obituary....  But nowhere in British records have I been able to find a birth record for William Doyle, born March 3, 1863.  Not in civil records or church records.  Doesn't that seem strange?

William Doyle, in brief
This William is my third-great-grandfather, the grandfather of the William Doyle, above.  This William was born about 1802; married Martha Reay in 1825; and died in 1838.  I have a church marriage record (which gives names and date of marriage) and a civil death record (which gives his age as 36 years).  Neither record names his parents, his birth date, or the location of his birth.  If only William Doyle weren't such a common name!

These are my current, and long-time, research challenges.  To be honest, research on these three has been laid to rest for several years.  Perhaps it's about time I pick up where I left off and research some more!

Thanks for the fun, and the push, Randy!

--Nancy.

Copyright ©2024, Nancy Messier.  All Rights Reserved. 
Do not copy or use any content from this blog without written permission from the owner.


Friday, April 12, 2024

Might One of My Ancestors Have Seen a Total Solar Eclipse?

I thought April 8th's total solar eclipse was amazing.  We travelled back roads to a little town about 45 minutes away and sat in the tiny parking lot of a store.  We listened to NASA's live presentation as we waited and watched.  We saw two minutes of totality but not total darkness as shown in this photo.  It was like sunset all around the horizon.  The temperature cooled and some of the birds began their evening song.  Really, just a once in a lifetime experience (unless I'm still alive in 2045!)
Photo courtesy of NASA HQ Photo.   Thank you, NASA.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasahqphoto/53645326260/

My ears perked up when I heard one of the NASA hosts use the word "generation."  She may have said something like, it will be more than a generation before the next eclipse comes to Ohio, but I'm not sure.  Just the word "generation" took my thoughts to my ancestors.  How many of them might have seen a total eclipse?

As I researched online, if what I read can be trusted, a total solar eclipse happens about every 18 months but crosses the same part of the earth in only about every 375 years.  That didn't give me much hope for my Ohio and Pennsylvania ancestors seeing a total solar eclipse. 

Looking at maps of past eclipses, I could not find a total solar eclipse that crossed over the localities where my ancestors lived at the times they were alive.  I had hoped we might share that in common.

However, there were plenty of newspaper reports of eclipses which my ancestors might have read.  I enjoyed the quaint language of this section of a small article from the August 7, 1860, issue of the Cincinnati Daily Press on page 4, column 1, entitled "The Late Solar Eclipse in Europe."
It reads,
    The Paris correspondent of the London
Times writes as follows:
   It wanted a few minutes to two when the
eclipse began, and whenever the sky cleared
the opaque body of the moon might be seen
creeping on in slow but sure advances.  The
greatest portion of the sun was covered about
three o'clock, and such parts of the sky as
were visible assumed a darker blue.  It was
nearly a quarter to four o'clock when the sun
got quite released from the grasp of his in-
vader.

Some past total solar eclipses happened on the dates below, but I didn't note the locations.
  • June 16, 1806
  • February 12, 1831
  • November 30, 1834
  • July 17, 1860
  • August 7, 1869
  • July 29, 1878
  • January 1, 1889
  • April 16, 1893
  • May 28, 1900

Thinking of my ancestors and solar eclipses reminded me of a post I wrote years ago titled Sharing the Sun.  My ancestors and I may not have a lot in common, but we have the sun. 

—Nancy.

Copyright © 2024 Nancy Messier.  All Rights Reserved. 
Do not copy or use any content from this blog without written permission from the owner. 

.

Friday, April 5, 2024

From Dixon to Elvira, "in consideration of the love and affection I bear to her my daughter"

I think it's unusual to find a deed in which a sentiment is included and even more unusual to find one in which a father tells of his love for his daughter.  But that's just what I found.

This deed (image and transcription below) with an indenture of property has my great-grandparents' and great-great-grandparents' names on it and their relationship is stated.  You can probably guess how I found it.  Yes, through FamilySearch's new full-text search of property records!  What a boon that resource is to family history researchers.  Thank you, FamilySearch.

In this record Dixon and Rebecca (Smith) Bartley deeded property, with an indenture, to Frederick and Elvira (Bartley) Gerner.  (Note the name variations:  Dixon is Dickson; Frederick is sometimes Fred; Elvira is sometimes Alvira.)  In an indenture, there is an exchange of obligations by both parties on the deed.  The deed was dated March 15, 1883.  Elvira was 28 years old with eight children, ages three months to 9 years.  Three years earlier, in June, 1880, Fred and Elvira were living in Putnam County, West Virginia.  I don't know the date of their return to Butler County, Pennsylvania, but it's clear from this document that they already owned property there.

Find this image here (with a free FamilySearch account).  It is in FamilySearch's collection, "Butler.  Deed Books 1882-1883, 1883-1884, Deeds 1884," image 396.  Image 330 and 331 tell me that the title of the book is Deed Book 69, owned by the Butler County Court House in Butler, Pennsylvania.   (To enlarge these pages for easier reading, click the image.  It will open in another tab and be easier to read.)

This is the transcription.
[page] 65 [left side]
Dickson Bartley Aux
To
Frederick Gerner
   Alvira  Gerner

      This Indenture, Made the Fifteenth day of March
one thousand eight hundred and Eighty Three between Dickson and
Rebecca Bartley of Parker Township Butler
County Pennsylvania of the first part
and Frederick Gerner and Alvira Gerner
his wife of the county and State aforesaid
parties of the second part
      Witnesseth, That the said parties of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of Eight Hundred Dollars, lawful money of the United States of America, unto them well and truly paid by the said parties of the second part, at or before the sealing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, HAVE granted, bargained, sold, aliened, enfeoffed, released, conveyed and confirmed, and by these presents DO grant bargain, sell, alien, enfeoff, release, convey and confirm unto the said parties of the SECOND PART, their heirs and assigns, forever, all the following described property, viz:
    Beginning at a stone pile on line of D. P. Kelly on the East thence along line of Harrison Adams One Hundred and nineteen perches to a Hickory tree, thence along line of George Daubenspeck ninety eight perches to a post.  Thence S. 87½ [degrees?] E along lands of the first party thence along line of D. P. Kelly to the place of beginning ninety eight perches.  To each of the parties of the second part in the following proportion. Thirty two acres off the North side to Frederick Gerner in his own right and in consideration of the erection and maintenance of a fence on one side of a lane leading from his house to the public road as well as the payment of Twenty five dollars per acre, the above consideration of Eight Hundred dollars.  And Forty acres to Alvira Gerner in her own right.  For and in consideration of the love and affection I bear to her my daughter Elvira.  Containing seventy two acres and one hundred and Forty perches as represented on drafts No 1 as surveyed by N M Slater February A D 1883.  It is understood between the parties hereto that the second parties are to have limestone for their use on the farm ? from the South East corner of said first parties lands
     Together with all and singular the Said property improvements, ways, waters, water courses, rights, liberties privileges, hereditaments and appurtenances whatsoever thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversions and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof and all the estate, right, title, interest property, claim and demand whatsoever of the said parties of the first part, in law, equity or otherwise howsoever, of, in and to the same and every part thereof TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said Seventy two acres and One Hundred and forty two perches of land hereditaments and premises hereby granted or mentioned, and intended so to be, with the appurtenances, unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, to and for the only proper use and behoof of the said partof [sic] the second part, their heirs and assigns FOREVER.

[page] 65 [right side]
AND Dickson Bartley and Rebecca Bartley his wife the said parties of the first part, their heirs, executors and administrators, do by these presents covenant, grant and agree to and with the said parties of the second part, heirs and assigns that they the said parties of the first part and their heirs, all and singular the hereditaments and premisce herein above described and granted or mentioned, and intended so to be, with the appurtenances, unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, against them, the said parties of the first part, and their heirs, and against all and every other person or persons whomsoever lawfully claiming, or to claim the same or any part thereof subject to the conditions herein set forth
SHALL AND WILL WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND.
     In Witness Whereof, The said parties of the first part have to these presents set their hands and seals.  Dated the day and year first above written.
Sealed and Delivered in the Presence }  Dickson Bartley (Seal)
J H Otto [signature]                           }  Rebecca  her x mark  Bartley  (Seal)
Jas Buzzard                                       }
     RECEIVED, the date above mentioned, of the above named parties of the second part, the sum of Eight Hundred DOLLARS, consideration money in full.  D. Bartley

State of Pennsylvania  }
Butler County             } SS.
On fifteenth day of March 1883, before me a Justice of the Peace came the above named Dickson Bartley and Rebecca Bartley his wife, and acknowledge the above deed to be their act and deed, and desire to have it recorded.  Said Rebecca Bartley being of full age, and by me examined, separate from her said husband and the contents of said Deed being first made known to her declared that she signed, sealed and delivered said Deed of her own free will and accord, without coercion or compulsion of her said husband.
     Witness my hand and seal, the day and year above written.
James Buzzard J. P.  [signature]  (Seal.)

     WITNESS:
Asa Steel

Recorded August 6th 1883
For me, the interest of this deed goes above and beyond a transfer of property.  Yes, Fred and Elvira payed for the property and Fred was to meet other considerations in return.  What I love about this document is Dixon's declaration that 40 acres will go to Elvira without any additional request of her "in consideration of the love and affection I bear to her my daughter Elvira."  At times like this I wish for a journal or photographs or anecdotal accounts to help me understand Dixon's and Elvira's relationship.  She was his sixth child and third daughter.  Did he have a special affection for her, and she for him? 

Notes, Comments, Thoughts

I find it interesting that the deed states only "Butler County" and not the township.  The only way to locate this property now would be to use an old map created after 1883 which identifies property boundary lines and names the property owners.  Since I know Dixon lived near Bruin in Parker Township and have identified his home, I believe it's safe to assume the property Dixon sold was in Parker Township.  It's surprising that none of the boundary lines Dixon used seemed to border his property.

It was interesting to learn that there was a lane from the public road to Fred and Elvira's house.  Wish I had photographs of that house!  These days would we call it a driveway?

Sometimes these old documents are brutal when it comes to the boilerplate language.  Below are some of the new words I encountered.  I found this post from a surveyor's point of view helpful.  For the words below I chose the simplest-to-understand definitions from across the internet.
  • Indenture of Property.  A deed in which two parties agree to continuing obligations
    From Investopedia.
  • Enfeoff.  To put in possession of land in exchange for a pledge of service, in feudal society.
    From https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/enfeoff
  • Perch.  A linear measurement of 5½ yards or 16½ feet; also called a rod or a pole.  
    From Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd ed. at https://thelawdictionary.org/perch/
  • Hereditaments.  An archaic term which is still found in some wills and deeds.  It denotes any kind of property, either tangible or intangible, that can be inherited.
    From https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/hereditament
  • Appurtenances.  Property (as an outbuilding or fixture) or a property right (as a right-of-way) that is incidental to a principal property and that passes with the principal property upon sale or transfer.
    From https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/appurtenance
  • Behoof.  An old-fashioned word that means something that is useful or beneficial to someone. It is often used in legal documents to describe a benefit that is part of a property transfer.
    From https://www.lsd.law/define/behoof
  • Premisce.  I was unable to find a definition for this word.  Perhaps it is a spelling variant of "premise."

The conditions of the indenture are these.
  • Dixon parted with the property.
  • He also give permission to use limestone from his property.
  • Fred and Elvira were to pay Dixon and Rebecca $800.00 for the property.
  • 32 acres were to go to Frederick in his own right.
  • Fred was to erect and maintain a fence on one side of a lane leading from his house to the public road.
  • Fred was to pay $25.00 per acre.  Was it in addition to the $800.00?  It's unclear to me.
  • 40 acres were to go to Elvira in her own right, "For and in consideration of the love and affection I bear to her my daughter Elvira."
  • It seems there were no conditions on Elvira's acres.
  • Frederick and Elvira were to have limestone for their use on the farm from the southeast corner of Dixon's property.

The witness to this deed, Asa Steele, was Elvira's brother-in-law, husband of Elvira's next younger sister, Lavina.

As thrilled as I am to find this deed/indenture, I can't help wishing the location of the property had been a little more specific, such as at least naming the township or town.  Perhaps more research will uncover a helpful map. 

—Nancy.

Copyright © 2024 Nancy Messier.  All Rights Reserved. 
Do not copy or use any content from this blog without written permission from the owner. 
.

Thursday, March 7, 2024

Genealogy-Related Posts

While scouting around the internet I sometimes find articles and posts that seem genealogy-related.  I enjoyed these recent finds and thought you might find them interesting.

Surprise! You Own a Long-Lost Cemetery

Swiss Maps Are Full of Hidden Secrets

The U.S. Census Is Wrong on Purpose:  they literally doubled one town's population

Watch the video to see what was found in a French child's 120-year-old time capsule.  Read more about the photographer who found the box and his process for developing the photographs here.




Enjoy!
--Nancy.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...